« Is This Thing On?
| Full Auto »

The big question for me is whether Windows will run on these laptops. I'm not talking about reformatting it immediately and running only Windows. A good portion of the value of the machine is obviously the OS and applications. However, I can't commit to spending that much if I am locked 100% into Mac. It's too big an investment. I have to have a fallback position to ease the transition over.
No word on a new iPod Shuffle. These had been discounted and cleared out of the channels, so I suppose we'll see an update sometime soon. The low end iBook like was also being heavily discounted, so who knows what the story is with that. They can't really mess with the new MacBook, so maybe it will just wither away or use a single core or something.Yeah over all a solid announcement. People always expect more. There were some good speculations this time around too, such as screen Shuffle, Media Center killer Intel Mac Mini. The more far out one I read was Apple entering the gaming market. -Yeah right.
The MacBook (stupid name me thinks), looks pretty solid. Mac users are going to love that since it really cranks up the performance over the G4. I think that mag plug thing is pretty cool since pretty much everyone has tripped over their laptop power cord. I agree with J, that what I'm most interested in seeing is if this thing will dual boot to Windows. If so then I predict it will be a very hot item indeed.
Paul, January 10, 2006 03:50 PM:I think they are just trying to get the name "Mac" into all their products. The iBook will become "MacBook", and the PowerBook is now "MacBook Pro".
Sort of like trying to spread the name "Pod": podcasting, etc.
Paul, January 10, 2006 06:22 PM:It's also funny that the day Apple announces Intel Macs, their stock price closes at $80.86... that's nice work!
George, January 10, 2006 10:33 PM:The iMac update was a bit of a suprise, seems like it was just updated a few months ago.
About the Shuffle, it's still available on the Apple website. The 1gb version went out of stock before xmas and I think that fueled the speculation the shuffle would be updated.
Ian (friend of J), January 12, 2006 12:59 AM:David Pogue of the NY Times wrote "Intriguingly, they'll all be technically capable of restarting in Microsoft Windows - not using an off-the-shelf copy, but perhaps with the assistance of a software kit written by some enterprising programmer."
Paul, January 12, 2006 11:16 AM: John, January 13, 2006 10:05 AM:Nah, they always say stuff like that when they think a keynote fell short. It's like the stuff you say to your kids when they are bad... "I was going to take you to McDonalds today, but not now." In this case Job's says, "I was going to announce something totally cool today, but I won't because Intel's been bad."
John, January 17, 2006 02:31 PM:Every day now I follow several links that alternate between proclaiming that the intelMac will boot Windows and that it won't.
J, January 17, 2006 02:36 PM:I also heard that the x64 version of windows will use the new EFI bios, but that the Core Duo chips don't support x64??? If so, that would really suck just from a computation perspective. Anyway, unless there's some crazy trusted computing stuff running in the EFI bios, I don't see why this won't be solved eventually, at least for Vista.
John, January 20, 2006 03:44 PM:Angry, angry young man.
J, January 20, 2006 04:46 PM:Now I know what kind of stuff the M$ boys are passing around the lunchroom! Pretty funny though. I definitely have more trouble with a mac now than a PC. The first thing that always gets me is that you have to resize a windows just by the bottom right corner. Apparently I'm always grabbing the edges of windows to resize them.
J, March 21, 2006 08:38 PM:So they've got the macbook running XP. Apparently it's pretty stable but there are some differences with the video card interface so the graphics aren't hardware accelerated. Things like WiFi do work however.
With "virtualization" and dual cores being all the rage, I'm surprised that people aren't looking at running the OSs simultaneously. There's been talk of a virtual pc type environment, which might be pretty cool.
J, April 24, 2006 09:54 AM:17" MacBookPro out now. Do people really like huge laptops?
Paul, April 24, 2006 03:08 PM:I don't. The 15" MacBook is as large a laptop as I'd buy. On the other hand, if you aren't a gamer, the 17" would be a nice home machine if you didn't intend to go mobile with it, since there are virtually no cables or fan noise and would take up much less space on a table.
J, April 24, 2006 03:28 PM:I'm interested in when I'll just have an iPod size computer that I can plug into any monitor/kbd/mouse/network and get going. But till then, I'm much more interested in a 12" laptop with DVI for big screen than a 17".
John, April 24, 2006 05:54 PM:I think that the 17" laptops are nice if you want one computer but have occasional need to move it to another room or take it somewhere. Since the battery life is so horrible though you really have just a 'portable'. Maybe they could just drop the battery all together to save money? I think I would prefer a Laptop to an IMac type machine in a small room (excluding price) since it takes up less volume and can be folded flat.
John, April 29, 2006 12:41 PM:Get a MacBook Pro in your choice of of 24 colors! This company will sell you a new pre painted one, or you can send your's in for a bling upgrade. The metallic black (carbon) looks pretty sweet. They all sell the Dell model I'm getting.